• Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
An Analysis of the Attributive Participle and the Relative Clause in the Greek New Testament

An Analysis of the Attributive Participle and the Relative Clause in the Greek New Testament

Hardcover

Series: Studies in Biblical Greek, Book 18

Religion General JudaismGeneral Christianity

ISBN10: 1433135078
ISBN13: 9781433135071
Publisher: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publi
Published: Mar 30 2018
Pages: 382
Weight: 1.55
Height: 1.10 Width: 6.00 Depth: 8.90
Language: English

Many New Testament Greek grammarians assert that the Greek attributive participle and the Greek relative clause are equivalent. Michael E. Hayes disproves those assertions in An Analysis of the Attributive Participle and the Relative Clause in the Greek New Testament, thoroughly presenting the linguistic categories of restrictivity and nonrestrictivity and analyzing the restrictive/nonrestrictive nature of every attributive participle and relative clause. By employing the Accessibility Hierarchy, he focuses the central and critical analysis to the subject relative clause and the attributive participle. His analysis leads to the conclusion that with respect to the restrictive/nonrestrictive distinction these two constructions could in no way be described as equivalent. The attributive participle is primarily utilized to restrict its antecedent except under certain prescribed circumstances, and when both constructions are grammatically and stylistically feasible, the relative clause is predominantly utilized to relate nonrestrictively to its antecedent. As a result, Hayes issues a call to clarity and correction for grammarians, exegetes, modern editors, and translators of the Greek New Testament.

Also from

Carson, D. A.

Also in

General Christianity